Journal of Cancer Prevention 2017; 22(4): 219-227
Published online December 30, 2017
https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2017.22.4.219
© Korean Society of Cancer Prevention
Gi Dae Kim
Department of Food, Nutrition and Biotechnology, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Korea
Correspondence to :
Gi Dae Kim, Department of Food, Nutrition and Biotechnology, Kyungnam University, 7 Kyungnamdaehak-ro, Masanhappo-gu, Changwon 51767, Korea, Tel: +82-55-249-2176, Fax: +0505-999-2104, E-mail: gidaekim@kyungnam.ac.kr, ORCID: Gi Dae Kim,
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Myricetin has been shown to possess potential antiangiogenic effects in endothelial cells. However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. Therefore, we evaluated its antiangiogenic effects in human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs). HUVECs were cultured in endothelial cell growth medium-2 to induce proliferation and angiogenesis and treated with different doses of myricetin (0.25, 0.5, and 1 μM) for 24 hours. Cell proliferation was analyzed by the MTT and lactate dehydrogenase release assays; angiogenesis was determined by the tube formation assay. In addition, cell signaling pathways related to angiogenesis were investigated by Western blotting. Myricetin induced apoptosis and procaspase-3 cleavage though the induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS). It significantly inhibited cell migration, tube formation, and PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in HUVECs. Myricetin exerts antiangiogenic effects by inducing ROS-mediated apoptosis and inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in HUVECs.Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords: Myricetin, Apoptosis, Angiogenesis, Human umbilical vascular endothelial cells
Angiogenesis is a physiological process through which new blood vessels are formed preexisting vessels.1 The inhibition of vascular formation holds promising anticancer potential.2,3 Therefore, studies to elucidate the mechanisms of angiogenesis in cancer and identify novel antiangiogenic agents are warranted.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulate angiogenesis; high levels of ROS can lead to oxidative cell damage and apoptosis.4 However, low levels of ROS promote endothelial cell growth, migration, and organization into tubular network structures, thereby driving angiogenesis.5 ROS-induced oxidative stress is considered an intrinsic death stimulus for the direct or indirect activation of the intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis pathway.6 The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is important for signaling in normal cells, but is also implicated in the development of various cancers. This pathway regulates cell proliferation, adhesion, migration, invasion, metabolism, differentiation, apoptosis, and survival.7,8 Phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate activates serine/threo-nine kinases, such as 3-phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase-1 (PDK1) and Akt. Phosphatase and tensin homolog encodes a phosphatase that opposes the action of PI3K and reduces the level of activated Akt, which controls protein synthesis and cell growth by stimulating the phosphorylation of mTOR.9 PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling proteins are reported to arrest cell growth and induce apoptosis via ROS generation.10
Natural phytochemicals are reported to possess significant therapeutic potential with negligible side effects.11,12 Polyphenols constitute an important class of natural bioactive compounds that are abundant in different plant species. Flavonoids are a type of polyphenols that are present in many different fruits and vegetables. They exert anticancer activities through their antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-angiogenic, anti-proliferative, and apoptotic actions.13–18 Myricetin has a quercetin backbone with an additional hydroxyl group (Fig. 1A). It is the major flavonoid found in onions, berries, and grapes.19–21 Its antioxidant, cytoprotective, antiviral, antimicrobial, antiplatelet, and anticancer activities have been reported.22–24 It significantly inhibits angiogenesis in vascular endothelial growth factor-stimulated human umbilical vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs).25 However, the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood.
We evaluated whether myricetin suppresses angiogenesis through the induction of ROS-mediated apoptosis and the inhibition of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling in HUVECs.
Myricetin (Fig. 1A) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The compound was dissolved in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). A 100 mmol/L stock solution of myricetin was prepared and stored as small aliquots at −20°C until needed. We purchased MTT, DMSO, gelatin, and Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies from Sigma-Aldrich. Growth factor-reduced Matrigel was purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA). The specific antibodies against PI3K, PDK1, AKT, mTOR, and their phospho forms, anti-procaspase-3 antibody, and the AKT inhibitor LY294002 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). The HRP-conjugated β-actin, p53, and Bax antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF) diacetate (H2DCFDA) was purchased from Molecular Probes (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
HUVECs were obtained from ATCC (Rockville, MD, USA) and cultured in endothelial cell growth medium-2 (EGM-2; Lonza, Walkersville, MD, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. HUVECs at passages 3 to 5 were used in the experiments. The commercially available vascular endothelial cell-specific supplement EGM®-2 MV Bullet kit was used.26
The cell viability was assessed by the MTT assay. HUVECs (5 × 103 cells/well) were seeded into a 96-well plate with EGM-2 medium supplemented with 10% FBS. The cells were allowed to adhere and the culture medium was removed. The cells incubated with serum-free medium for 12 hours. After serum starvation, the cells were cultured in fresh medium supplemented with 2% FBS and various concentrations of myricetin at 37°C for 24 hours. After incubation, MTT solution was added and the reaction plate was incubated for an additional 4 hours. The resulting formazan deposit was solubilized with DMSO and the absorbance at 570 nm was measured with a VersaMax ELISA microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The effects of myricetin on cytotoxicity were tested by using the CytoTox 96® Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega, Ma-dison, WI, USA). The viability and cytotoxicity of myricetin were calculated as a percentage relative to the solvent-treated control. The IC50 values were calculated by using a non-linear regression analysis of the percentage growth versus concentration.
HUVECs were plated in culture dishes with a 100-mm diameter and incubated. On the next day, the cells were treated with various concentrations (0.25, 0.5, and 1 μM) of myricetin for 24 hours. Subsequently, the cells were harvested and fixed with 70% ethanol overnight at 4°C. The cells were washed, stained with 50 μg/mL propidium iodide (PI) and 50 μg/mL RNase A for 1 hour in the dark, and then analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of cells in each specific cell cycle phase. Flow cytometric analysis was performed by using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) equipped with a 488 nm argon laser. The events were evaluated for each sample and the cell cycle distribution was determined by using Cell Quest software (Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany). The results were presented as the number of cells versus the amount of DNA, as indicated by fluorescence signal intensity. All experiments were conducted three times.
To determine the level of apoptosis after exposure of HUVECs to myricetin for 24 hours, an annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) apoptosis detection kit (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used. In this assay, annexin V-FITC binds to phosphatidylserine, which translocates to the outer leaflet of the plasma membrane during the early stages of cell apoptosis. Therefore, apoptotic cells are specifically stained with annexin V-FITC, whereas the necrotic cells were double-stained with both annexin V-FITC and PI. The cells were suspended in binding buffer at a final cell concentration of 1 × 105 cells/mL and incubated with both annexin V-FITC and PI for 25 minutes in the dark. The DNA content of the stained cells was analyzed by using CellQuest Software and a FACS Vantage SE flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
The intracellular ROS levels were measured by using the fluorescent dye H2DCFDA. First, HUVECs were incubated with myricetin for 24 hours. The cells were then washed twice, stained with 20 μM H2DCFDA for 30 minutes, and subjected to two further washes. As H2DCFDA reacts with ROS to form the fluorescent compound DCF, the intracellular DCF intensity was measured by using a flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).
HUVECs were allowed to grow to full confluence in 6-well plates pre-coated with 0.1% gelatin and then incubated with 10 mg/mL mitomycin C (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 for 2 hours to inactivate the HUVECs. The monolayers of HUVECs were wounded by a scratch with a 0.2-mL pipette tip. Fresh medium containing various concentrations of myricetin was added. After incubation for 24 hours, representative images were captured by using an inverted phase contrast light microscope (Olympus Optical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) after 24 hours incubation. The migrated cells from three randomly selected fields were quantified by manual counting (DMC advanced program) under an optical microscope at 200× magnification and the inhibition was calculated as a percentage relative to the control.
Matrigel (70 μL/well) was added to a 96-well plate and polymerized for 30 minutes at 37°C. The HUVECs (3 × 104 cells) were seeded onto each well of the Matrigel-coated 96-well plate and then incubated in EBM-2 supplemented with 2% FBS and various concentrations of myricetin. After incubation for 8 hours, the formation of the endothelial cell tubular structure was visualized under an inverted microscope and photographed at 40× magnification. Furthermore, tube formation was calculated from the tube length, normalized, and expressed as a percentage by normalization with untreated control cells.
The cells were treated with myricetin for 24 hours. Harvested cells were lysed in protein extraction solution (Intron Biotechnology, Inc., Seongnam, Korea) containing protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors for 10 minutes at 4°C. The total protein concentration in the supernatant was measured by using the Bradford assay. Forty microgram samples of the total proteins were heated at 95°C for 5 minutes and subjected to 6% to 15% SDS-PAGE. The proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) at 100 V for 60 to 100 minutes. The membranes were incubated with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in TBS with 0.05% tween 20 (TBST) for 30 minutes at room temperature and then with primary antibodies diluted at dilutions of 1 : 200 to 1 : 1,000 in 5% BSA in TBST overnight at 4°C. The membranes were washed three times with TBST and incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies. The protein bands were detected by using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection kit (Intron Biotechnology, Inc.) and an LAS-1000 Imager (Fuji Film Corp., Tokyo, Japan).
The results were expressed as the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by using one-way ANOVA and Student’s
To determine the non-cytotoxic concentration of myricetin against HUVECs, the cells were treated with myricetin (0.16, 0.8, 4, and 20 μM) for 24 hours. Subsequently, cell viability was evaluated by the MTT (Fig. 1B) and lactate dehydrogenase release assays (Fig. 1C). We observed that concentrations above 4 μM caused cytotoxic effects. Therefore, analysis of biological activities of myricetin was conducted at concentrations lower than 4 μM in subsequent experiments. Flow cytometry was used to analyze the effects of myricetin on the cell cycle of HUVECs. After exposure to myricetin for 24 hours, the cells were harvested and analyzed for their cell cycle distribution (sub-G1, G0/G1, S, and G2/M). Myricetin increased the population of cells in the sub-G1 phase, which is indicative of apoptotic cell death (Fig. 2A).
The apoptotic effect of myricetin was further confirmed by flow cytometric analysis based on annexin V-FITC/PI double staining. The results (Fig. 2B) showed that exposure to myricetin (0.25, 0.5, and 1 μM) for 24 hours increased the number of late apoptotic and necrotic cells in a dose-dependent manner. Particularly, myricetin (1 μM) increased the percentage of apoptotic cells (24.47%) compared to vehicle treatment (3.55%). We further evaluated the effects of myricetin on the regulators of apoptosis. Western blot analysis revealed that exposure to myricetin for 24 hours increased the levels of p53 and Bax (pro-apoptotic protein) and induced the cleavage of procaspase-3 to caspase-3 (Fig. 2C).
To investigate whether myricetin induced apoptosis through the generation of intracellular ROS, its effects on ROS levels were analyzed using an oxidant-sensitive fluorescent dye in the endothelial cells; myricetin (1 μM) significantly increased intracellular ROS levels compared to vehicle treatment (Fig. 3).
Endothelial cell migration and tube formation are essential steps in angiogenesis. Therefore, we determined the effects of myricetin on endothelial cell migration using a wound healing assay. Myricetin suppressed the migration of HUVECs in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 4A and 4C). We also observed capillary-like tube structures after incubation for 4 to 8 hours in Matrigel (Fig. 4B and 4C). However, myricetin treatment resulted in broken and foreshortened tubes, indicating that it markedly inhibits vascular formation in HUVECs.
To investigate whether myricetin affected the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway, the constitutive activation of downstream targets of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway was evaluated in HUVECs. Myricetin attenuated the phosphorylation of both PI3K and PDK1 in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). In addition, it inhibited Akt phosphorylation, indicating that it suppresses mTOR signaling in HUVECs. We also found that co-treatment with an Akt inhibitor, LY294002, and myricetin synergistically suppressed Akt activation (Fig. 5B).
Angiogenesis inhibitors hold significant anticancer potential. Due to fewer adverse effects, herbal or natural drugs are preferred over synthetic drugs.27,28 The inhibition of angiogenesis slows tumor growth,29 making antiangiogenic therapy a promising anticancer treatment option.30 Flavonoids have been reported to exert antitumor effects.31,32 Myricetin, a flavonoid that is abundant in fruits and vegetables, exhibits anticancer and anti-diabetic properties.33 It has been shown to inhibit proliferation, cell cycle progression, and apoptosis in human colon cancer cells.34 It suppresses UVB-induced skin cancer,35 inhibits the growth of MCF7 cells,36 and acts as an agonist of estrogen receptor alpha in breast cancer.37 Myricetin has been shown to induce apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells without damaging normal pancreatic ductal cells; it is reported to activate mitochondrial apoptosis by increasing the levels of annexin V- and TUNEL-positive cells, the release of cytochrome
Apoptosis is a highly regulated process; the tumor suppressor protein, p53, induces as well as inhibits apoptosis.39 It regulates DNA repair and cell cycle progression.40 The induction of apoptosis by myricetin was confirmed by an increase in the percentage of annexin V-positive cells, the levels of p53 and Bax, and the cleavage of procaspase-3 to caspase-3. Oxidative stress occurs due to an imbalance between pro-oxidant and antioxidant cellular factors, and causes cell damage.41 ROS comprise superoxide and hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and singlet oxygen; they are byproducts of mitochondrial respiration and contribute to oxidative stress. Increased intracellular levels of ROS lead to the activation of apoptotic pathways.42 Upon analysis using an oxidant-sensitive fluorescent dye (H2DCFDA), we found that myricetin significantly enhanced the production of intracellular ROS in HUVECs, indicating that it induces apoptosis by increasing intracellular ROS levels. Mitochondria play a crucial role in respiratory metabolism and cell cycle progression; they regulate extrinsic and intrinsic apoptotic pathways, and affect cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival. They are the major cell organelles responsible for intracellular ROS production. Increased ROS levels reduce the mitochondrial membrane potential, thereby activating apoptotic pathways; therefore, mitochondrial dysfunction leads to apoptosis.43 The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and its downstream targets are activated during angiogenesis.44 Akt is a serine/threonine kinase that regulates a variety of cellular functions, including cell growth, proliferation, migration, protein synthesis, transcription, survival, and angiogenesis.45 mTOR kinase, the central regulator of cell metabolism, growth, proliferation, and survival, is also activated during tumor initiation, progression, and angiogenesis.9,45
In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that myricetin inhibits angiogenesis in endothelial cells by inducing ROS-mediated apoptosis and inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling. Therefore, we propose that myricetin, as an antiangiogenic agent, is a promising anticancer drug candidate.
This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (2014R1A1A3052322).
Kushal Kandhari, Sandeep Paudel, Komal Raina, Chapla Agarwal, Rama Kant, Michael F. Wempe, Cindy O’Bryant, Rajesh Agarwal
J Cancer Prev 2021; 26(4): 266-276 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2021.26.4.266Young-Min Han, Hye-Rin Ahn, Da-Young Lee, Moon-Young Song, Seung-Won Lee, You-Kyung Jang, Byeong Yeob Jeon, Eun-Hee Kim
J Cancer Prev 2024; 29(4): 165-174 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.24.029Muhammad Haroon, Sun Chul Kang
J Cancer Prev 2024; 29(3): 69-87 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.24.013