Journal of Cancer Prevention 2016; 21(1): 1-12
Published online March 30, 2016
© Korean Society of Cancer Prevention
Huzefa Vahora1, Munawwar Ali Khan2, Usama Alalami2, and Arif Hussain1
1School of Life Sciences, Manipal University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 2Department of Natural Science and Public Health, College of Sustainability Sciences and Humanities, Zayed University, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Correspondence to :
Arif Hussain, School of Life Sciences, Manipal University, P.O. Box 345050, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Tel: +971-44290738, Fax: +971-4369-4541, E-mail: email@example.com, ORCID: Arif Hussain,
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Nitric oxide (NO) in general plays a beneficial physiological role as a vasorelaxant and the role of NO is decided by its concentration present in physiological environments. NO either facilitates cancer-promoting characters or act as an anti-cancer agent. The dilemma in this regard still remains unanswered. This review summarizes the recent information on NO and its role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression, as well as dietary chemopreventive agents which have NO-modulating properties with safe cytotoxic profile. Understanding the molecular mechanisms and cross-talk modulating NO effect by these chemopreventive agents can allow us to develop better therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.
Keywords: Chemoprevention, Nitric oxide, Inducible nitric oxide synthase, Endothelial nitric oxide synthase, Neoplasms
Nitric oxide (NO) is a multifunctional gaseous transmitter which is lipophilic, as well as one of the smallest molecules found in nature.1–3 A free radical in gaseous state functions as a messenger via cyclic GMP (cGMP).1 It was identified as a vasoactive small molecule in the 1980s and its cardiovascular activities are significant in relation to its vasorelaxation function as well as anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects. As a gasotransmitter, it regulates many physiological functions in the body, including neurotransmission, immune response, and anti-pathogenic effect,1–3 although NO is quite unstable and possess a half-life of 1 to 5 seconds in vivo.
Under normal physiological conditions, NO is produced by three isoforms of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) (Fig. 1), Neuronal NOS (nNOS/NOS1) and endothelial NOS (eNOS/NOS3) form the constitutive NOS category (cNOS), activating NO production for seconds to minutes in nanomolar concentrations. Contrastingly, the third isoform, inducible NOS (iNOS/NOS2), produces greater amounts of NO, reaching micromolar concentrations and lasting hours or days. cNOS members are dependent on the calcium ion concentrations for their activity, thus they are able to produce lower amounts of NO for shorter durations, in comparison to iNOS which is independent of the calcium ion concentration.1–3 NOS enzymes are dimeric in nature and two distinct catalytic domains, N-terminal oxygenase domain, and C-terminal reductase domain, are present on each monomer. The substrates binding to the N-terminal are Heme-5,6,7,8- tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4), L-arginine, and oxygen and the substrates binding to the C-terminal are NADPH, flavin mononucleotide, and flavin adenine dinucleotide.1 NO production is catalyzed by NADPH and oxygen as cosubstrates of L-arginine in the presence of NOS. The process of NO synthesis takes place in two steps: (i) hydroxylation of L-arginine to Nω-hydroxy-L-arginine by NOS and (ii) oxidation of Nω-hydroxy-L-arginine to L-citrulline and NO. The unpaired electrons of NO impart its reactivity towards inorganic molecules (oxygen, superoxide, or transition metals), DNA structures, and prosthetic groups, thus portraying its extensive biological activity.3
The actions of NO are mainly mediated through cGMP-dependent manner as well as cGMP-independent manner. The heme component of soluble guanylyl cyclase is targeted by NO, which further undergoes coupling with c-GMP-dependent protein kinase G and phosphodiesterases as well as cyclic nucleotide gated channels. In circumstances where cGMP is not available, the actions of NO are carried out independent of cGMP at low concentrations mainly in three ways, (i) interaction with proteins containing transition metal, (ii) interaction with proteins without the attached NO group, and (iii) modulation of cell signaling by posttranslational modification, mainly by forming S-nitrosothiol (SNO), which is achieved by coupling of a nitroso species to a reactive thiol group in specific cysteine residues, namely, S-nitrosylation.1–3
Over many years, NO was considered to be oncogenic in nature. Evidence has shown that NO plays a variety of roles in various stages of carcinogenesis by damaging the DNA, activating oncogenes, regulating apoptosis and metastasis, and inhibiting enzymes for DNA repair and tumor suppressor genes. Pro-tumor effects of NO were linked to the expression of NO-producing enzymes in tumor progression.2 NO also portrays anti-tumor effects by utilizing the immune defense mechanisms in animal models of various human cancers.1,3
Since decades, a dual role of NO has been observed and more studies is conducted to unravel the mysterious functions of this versatile molecule. Therefore, this review aims at showing the recent information on NO and its role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression.
NO, a free radical and water-soluble gas produced endogenously, regulates quite a few essential biological processes.4 Since a few decades, an interest in NO has been increased as a molecule involved in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. However, a controversial facet exists in understanding its role in the biology of cancer.4 This small molecule possesses the quality to either induce cancer progression or halt cancer growth and act as therapeutic agents.4,5 In conditions where NO is at lower concentrations, it aids in angiogenesis, which stimulates tumor progression by giving blood flow access to the tumor and subsequently result in cell proliferation (Fig. 2).5 On the contrary, higher levels of NO tend to be cytotoxic to cancer cells. This is achieved by the formation of peroxynitrite, which acts as an inducer of apoptosis and other toxic species during immune surveillances.5 Interestingly, peroxynitrite plays a dual role by aiding in inflammation-related carcinogenesis through the formation of 8-nitroguanine, a DNA-damaging entity and biomarkers.3–7
The release of various growth factors and mediators, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and NO, during the subsequent stages of tumorigenesis, changes the host microenvironment, inducing inflammation and preventing apoptosis.3 The calcium-independent NOS2 (iNOS) activation in almost all nucleated mammalian cells produces NO in higher concentrations for longer durations in comparison to its other two isoforms. The regulation of NOS2 lies in the hands of the tumor suppressor gene p53, which inhibits NOS2 by operating a negative feedback mechanism against high levels of NOS2. This relation has shown some significant implications pertaining to cancer and its progression (Fig. 2).4 The cells transfected with iNOS showed a substantial decrease in growth under in vitro conditions, which was indicative of cytostatic nature of NO. This effect was observed to be tumor-specific under in vivo conditions. Some tumors showed less aggressive phenotypes and others displayed a very aggressive nature.8
The upregulation of iNOS plays the most compelling role in the elevation and inhibition of tumorigenesis and metastasis. Suppression of tumorigenesis by upregulation of iNOS was evident in oral cancer cells.9 Poor patient survival is often related to expression of iNOS in malignant melanoma stage III patients, whereas this is observed to a lesser extent in patients with breast cancer. Stage III ovarian cancer patients responded better towards first line chemotherapy when iNOS was not expressed.10 This dichotomous nature of NO implies that its level in cancers varies quite significantly in relation to iNOS expression.
It is estimated by The International Agency for Research on Cancer that infectious disease-induced cancer cases around the world account for approximately 18%, whereas chronic inflammation-induced cancer cases account for approximately 25%.6
Some of the important factors for carcinogenesis which have been noted are infection and chronic inflammation. Inflammatory environment results in the production of reactive nitrogen species (RNS) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) from epithelial and inflammatory cells, which consequently lead to oxidative and nitrative damage of the DNA, such as 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-dG) and 8-nitroguanine. These DNA damage cause mutations in stem cells and subsequent initiation/progression. iNOS is upregulated by transcription factors such as hypoxia-inducible factor 1-α, STAT, NF-κB, and TNF-α. NF-κB, plays a very crucial role for inducing iNOS, which subsequently functions to be a tumor promoter during inflammation-related carcinogenesis (Fig. 3).9
Colonization of tumors in other sites of the body takes place in multistep process, including local invasion, entry in the circulation, transport to distant sites, exit from circulation, and ultimately colony formation. Though these events appear to be synonymous in most of the tumors, there appears to be some tissue specific characteristics which prevail in the molecular or phenotypic areas. One important characteristic is the colonization of a specific tumor to a specific location in the body. For example, prostate cancer mainly metastasizes to the bone whereas ocular melanoma establishes colonies in the liver. Interestingly, breast cancer shows metastasis to range of tissues such as bone, brain, liver, and lungs.
It is a well-established fact that NO plays an important role in the process of angiogenesis/lymphangiogenesis. Not only is the formation of these vessels undertaken by NO but its maintenance is also looked upon by it. Thus, the expression of NOS can be correlated to lymphatic metastasis. In particular, eNOS is the mediator for VEGF-C induced lymphangiogenesis and is thus involved in lymphatic metastasis. It has been demonstrated that inhibiting eNOS pharmacologically or genetically decreases the number of tumor cells reaching to the draining lymph node of that tumor and thus reduces the chances of macroscopic metastasis formation. This suggests that NO participates in the early steps of lymphatic metastasis.11 Another important factor for achieving metastasis is the epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT). In the earlier stages of cancer, the tumor is encapsulated and localized by the basement membrane. As the cancer progresses, the epithelial cells are transformed to act as mesenchymal cells, losing their epithelial properties. Once these transformed cells enter the circulation and reach new sites, they undergo mesenchymal epithelial transition and then establish new tumors.1 One of the main features of such a transformation is the anomalous expression of cell adhesion molecules that is mediated by NO, the paucity of which triggers the dissemination of tumor cells. Of these, E-cadherin is associated with the early stages of EMT.12 It was demonstrated that the downregulation of E-cadherin is a potent prognostic factor in determining the metastasis of gastric cancer.13
Other endocrine markers, such as estrogen-related receptor alpha, also suppressed E-cadherin expression, thereby inducing EMT in lung carcinoma.14 TGF-β induced modulation of E-cadherin aggravated ovarian cancer metastasis.15 Induction of NO synthesis resulted in an upregulation in E-cadherin expression.16 ATP receptor P2X7, another stimulus that is higher in the extracellular microenvironment of cancer cells than normal cells, has been recently concluded to promote tumor invasion and hence be involved in metastasis.12 NO also impairs the regulation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP), which is crucial to controlling matrix remodeling and metastasis.17,18
NO has been shown to induce apoptosis through post-translational modifications.19 Studies on cervical cancer HeLa cells, suggest the role of NO donor in increasing Fas expression, which in turn induces apoptosis. Conversely, enormous data on the anti-apoptotic effect of NO has been well accumulated. NO augmented DNA damage in lung adenocarcinoma which in fact triggered the anti-apoptotic machinery.20 The predominant reason for the inhibition of apoptosis by NO is the occlusion of caspase 3 expression.21 S-nitrosylation of the active cysteine rich sites of caspases, results in oxidation of thiols (involved in cell survival and apoptotic signaling pathway), thereby inhibiting the mechanism of apoptosis.21,22 Denitrosylation of caspase3 in cancer cells by adenovirus ZD55-IL-24 has clearly demonstrated the crucial role of caspase3 pathway in causing apoptosis.21 It was also substantiated in ovarian cancer.21
Upregulation of BCl2 plays a significant role in inhibiting cell death.22 Additionally, several NO donors have shown to activate anti-apoptotic pathways such as NF-κB (Fig. 3).22 NO also activates Ras protein, which in turn augments the anti-apoptotic Akt pathway.23 A recent study on lung cancer revealed that prolonged NO exposure intriguingly led to chemotherapeutic resistance to cisplatin, through the upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes BCl2 protein kinase AKT.22,23 A calcium binding protein, regucalcin, interferes with the calcium signalling and hence influences the gene expression of calcium dependent NOS, as observed in hepatoma cells. This suppressed apoptosis, as manifested by the over-activation of BCl2 and inactivation of caspases.24 Consequently, NO inhibitors were analysed for their therapeutic potential in order to promote apoptosis in nasopharyngeal cancer.25 NO inhibitors rendered a reactivation of apoptosis and angiogenesis in adenoid cystic carcinoma.26 It is known that NO interferes with the DNA binding activity of many zinc finger transcription factors through S-nitrosylation of cysteine thiol groups and formation of SNO subsequently. Oxidation of these thiol proteins may act as switches in signaling pathways. NO is also thought to modulate many other thiol-containing enzymes and regulatory proteins, such as NF-κB.22
Angiogenesis is a critical molecular event involved in tumor progression.27 A wide array of genes and transcription factors act as pro-angiogenic mediators, including NO, all of which are involved in promoting neovascularization.27 Several studies have implicated the role of NO in angiogenesis.27 NO stimulates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling pathway, as well as the tumor suppressor p53 and VEGF, which are collective mediators that exacerbate angiogenesis.28 NO-mediated angiogenesis is linked to an anomaly in the regulation of angiogenesis inhibitor thrombospondin 2.27,28
Proliferative and angiogenic growth factors such as VEGF have predominantly shown to affect NO signaling and hence augment angiogenesis.29 VEGF expression was shown to induce NOS2 in various human cancers.30,31 VEGF stimulates eNOS expression, which has been identified as a downstream regulator of angiogenesis,31,32 by the activation of receptor tyrosine kinase and protein kinase C signalling pathway.32 The relation between NO and VEGF is reciprocal. Studies on hypoxia-induced iNOS elevation possibly through NF-κB,33 have also shown a paramount elevation in the expression of VEGF during endometrial angiogenesis.34
The epidermal growth factor (EGF) is yet another ligand binding to protein associated with tumor progression, owing to its angiogenic potential.35 Previous studies have conclusively shown EGF to be a coactivator in iNOS transcription.36 Previously, an aberrant expression of EGFR in squamous cell carcinoma elevated the expression of iNOS.36 A study has further substantiated the involvement of iNOS in EGFR up regulation in gall bladder tumorigenesis.35 Another study showed upregulation of eNOS through EGF like domain of CD93 protein in endothelial cells.37 The data from previous study is associated with the stimulation of NO production through EGFR via the PI3K-dependent pathway.35,37
NO upregulation is also associated with the increase in the expression of COX-2, inhibition of which abates the process of tumor angiogenesis in different cancer.38,39 Another protein, angiopoietin-like 4 (ANGPTL4), has recently shown to upregulate iNOS expression. ANGPTL4 is associated with regulating vascular permeability and is therefore crucial in promoting angiogenesis.40 It was explicitly demonstrated that inducible NOS upregulated through the application of ANGPTL4 recombinant protein in a mouse model. The study showed the involvement of integrin/JAK/STAT3 pathway in the increase of ANGPTL4-mediated iNOS elevation.41
Hence, NO has been substantiated to exert its angiogenic property via the modulation of various genes and transcriptional factors that exacerbate angiogenesis.42
Increased NO levels are manifested in the progression of endometrial carcinogenesis.43 Previous reports indicate the interaction between iNOS, Bcl-2, and p53 to be a prognostic factor associated with the progression of endometrial carcinoma.43 Molecular studies have shown that the susceptibility to gynecological cancers such as endometrial and cervical cancers increases by inflammatory markers including NOS and COX-2.44 There is a positive correlation between elevated iNOS, COX-2, and angiogenesis in endometrial tumors.43,44 A recent case study on the Turkish women identified the G894T and variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) intron 4 polymorphisms in the eNOS gene to instigate endometrial cancer in such women.45 eNOS expression has also been correlated with endometrial invasion.45 Various therapeutic agents administered for endometrial cancer emphasize on their anti-inflammatory potential, especially with respect to the downregulation of NOS expression.43,44
There has been strident investigation to associate the risk of prostate cancer with NO synthase levels.45 A plethora of meta-analyses has identified NOS3 gene polymorphisms as strong susceptibility factors for the progression towards prostate cancer.46 A meta-analysis conducted by Zhao et al.47 suggested the eNOS gene 894G > T polymorphism to aggravate the onset of prostate cancer in males. Nikolić et al.48 also corroborated the involvement of eNOS or NOS3 gene in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. NOS3 rs1799983 polymorphism augmented the risk of prostate cancer in various populations.49 As one of the possible mechanisms, the involvement of the NO receptor component, sGCα1, in mediating the proliferation of prostate carcinogenesis, has been surmised.49 Anti-cancer agents such as gold lotion have successfully demonstrated their anti-carcinogenic potential through the downregulation of iNOS.50,51 Yu et al.52 also elucidated the significance of eNOS as a seemingly promising strategy for targeting anti-androgen resistant prostate cancer. Arginine-releasing compounds such as carboxypeptidase-D increased NO production, which correlated with survival and progression of prostate cancer.53
Cervical cancer takes the second position as one of the most common female cancers recording > 200,000 deaths per year. Its risk factors include chronic inflammation, long use of oral contraception, smoking, multiparity, and sexually transmitted diseases such as chlamydia, herpes.4 Cervical cells, such as squamous, glandular epithelial, and stromal cells, generate NO, which is a key signaling molecule shown to play an eminent role in various physiological processes (preparing the cervix for pregnancy, etc.).54 However, elevated levels of NO have been reported in cervical cancer patients, thereby indicating its mutagenic and carcinogenic potential in cervical cancer progression. NO plays a crucial role in the progression of cervical carcinogenesis through human papilloma virus (HPV).3 It was concluded that NO is a pragmatic cofactor that promotes HPV-induced cervical carcinogenesis.55 Moreover, susceptibility to HPV infection as observed through the cytological changes in the cervix correlates with an elevated expression of both eNOS and iNOS.27 Of these, iNOS, plays a prominent role in tumor progression, by promoting angiogenesis and thus regulating the level of VEGF.56 This explanation was corroborated by an iNOS knockdown experiment in HeLa cells that reduced their proliferation.57 High NO concentrations impair the migration of neutrophil migration, which express receptors necessary for extricating tumor cells in cervical neoplasia.57 NO also encumbers the success rate of conventional treatment therapy. In a study by Chen et al.,58 overexpression of iNOS along with COX-2 correlated with diminished survival rates of cervical cancer patients on radiotherapy regime.
Breast cancer is the predominant cause of mortality among women worldwide. Tumorigenesis in the mammary gland has been reported to correlate with VNTR 4 a/b polymorphism that regulate eNOS expression.59 NO can modulate tumor aggression in breast carcinoma through the inhibition of enzymes linked to DNA repair machinery.60,61 Moreover, iNOS inhibits DKK glycoprotein, which is crucial to regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.8 Abrogation of this pathway is activated in several tumors, including breast cancer.62 A diagnostic evaluation of inflammatory markers associated with breast cancer prognosis includes NO as well.63 Apoptosis of triple negative breast cancer cells have been attained through the modulation of iNOS activity.64 Knockdown of genes regulated by NO signaling pathway ameliorated breast tumor metastasis.65 Augsten et al.66 demonstrated an upregulation of NOS levels in CXCL14-expressing cancer-associated fibroblasts which triggers tumor growth and metastasis. The manifestation of chemo-resistance as well as metastasis in breast cancer cells are rendered through NO elevation, which therefore results in poor survival of patients.67 Importantly, NO induces tamoxifen-resistance in ER positive breast cancer.68
One of the major causes of morbidity and mortality and the sixth most common cancer type is the oral squamous cell carcinoma. Its high occurrence is affiliated with the use of tobacco and tobacco-related products such as cigarettes. Tobacco components act as initiators of inflammation which consequently are responsible for the production of RNS. RNS hamper the antioxidant protective system and induce lipid peroxidation in tobacco users.4 Head and neck cancer (HNC) shows an increased level of NOS activity which is correlated with high levels of cGMP levels and vascularization in the tumor mass. Lymph node metastases are associated with microvessel density as well as high NOS activity, which is indicative of high metastatic nature.69 Mutations in p53 have been correlated with overexpression of iNOS as well as oxidative stress.70 Patients with oral pre-cancer displayed high levels of NO2 and NO3 as well individuals with tobacco usage showed similar results.71 This is indicative of the injuries caused by the RNS in patients with pre-cancer as well healthy individual with tobacco usage. This aspect has a clinical relevance in acting as a biomarker of inflammation and can be utilized for the estimation of cancer risk.4 Ethanol stimulates NO generation and is important to the etiology of a few cancer including HNC.4
Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity at present.71 The primary cause for this devastating disease is tobacco smoke, which triggers chronic inflammation of the airway and activates leukocytes that produce ROS and NO at higher levels. An increased level of nitrite, nitrotyrosine, and NO are noted in lung cancer patients.72 Substantially higher levels of iNOS are observed in lung tissues of smokers in comparison to the non-smokers.4 It is observed that cigarette smoke has about 1014 ROS and 700 ppm NO in a single puff.73 A high level of NO is present in the exhaled air from the lung cancer patients in comparison to healthy controls. A significantly high level of nitrated proteins were found in the serum correlating to the presence of nitrosative and oxidative stress.73
It was also demonstrated that cells treated with NO over a long period of time increased the number of filopodia per cell and cell division cycle 42 protein was also found to be in higher concentration. This shows that long term exposure of cells to NO has a unique effect on migratory potential of the cells via caveolin-1-dependent mechanism.73 NO works towards carcinogenesis by nitrating proteins. Nitration of proteins takes place by the reaction of NO and its metabolites with ROS which lead to production of high caliber nitrating agents. One of the main chemical modifications occurring due to oxidative/nitrosative stress is the formation of 3-nitrotyrosine in proteins. NO at high levels deactivates p53 which consequently aids in the progression of cancer and it stands true in 90% of lung cancer cases, which are found to be p53 defective.4
Having witnessed abundant advances in the field of therapeutics, some diseases still remain as a global threat to life: one among them is gastric cancer. It is well established that the carcinogenesis of the gastric tissues is positively attributed to infection of Helicobacter pylori and excessive intake of salt4 whereas there has been a debate on whether alcohol consumption and tobacco smoking are associated with the neoplastic transformation. Interestingly, all the three isoforms of NOS (nNOS, iNOS, and eNOS) express in the gastric canal. High expression levels of iNOS and eNOS have been observed in human colorectal cancers.4 Tumor angiogenesis plays a vital role in progression of the cancerous cells and result in metastasis. Cell proliferation promotes by supplying blood vessels to the tumor by VEGF, which aids in the formation new blood vessels. The levels of VEGF correlate with the levels of NO. High serum VEGF levels were noted in gastric cancer patients in comparison to the healthy control group, which directly indicates that NO plays an important role in the progression of cancer by providing means of better blood supply and ways for cancer cells to establish new centers via metastasis.74
Many vital physiological activities, such as vasculature and neurotransmission, are influenced by NO. Many disorders of the central nervous system portray NO as an important mediator of neurotoxicity. nNOS expression is an indicator for differentiation of brain tumor and malignancy. Unexpected high NO levels are observed in central nervous system malignancies and this suggests that there is some correlation between NO production and pathophysiological processes of tumor progression.4
Conventional chemotherapeutic drugs are a part of standard cancer treatment regime. While several drugs have displayed anti-inflammatory and pro-apoptotic activity via alleviation of NO signalling,75 patients administered with drugs, namely tamoxifen citrate, capecitabine, and epirubicin, have incurred cardiovascular and other cytotoxicity through the aggravation of NO signaling.76 Moreover, chronic inflammation, which is involved in the elevation of markers such as cytokines and NO, is associated with immunosuppression in cancer, thereby hindering the survival outcome of patients.77 Owing to these complexities, chemoprevention may be the new buzzword and hence there have been ongoing attempts to evaluate multidimensional involvement of chemopreventive agents through targeting various hallmarks of cancer (Fig. 4).78 Chemoprevention focuses on the identification of certain dietary agents that can, if not completely cure, alleviate cancer proliferation in the body. Certain dietary agents and phytochemicals with chemo-preventive potential involve anti-inflammatory mechanisms that reduce NO levels and consequently help to inhibit the function of genes and markers involved in tumor progression, thereby abating the process of carcinogenesis. Many phytochemicals such as flavonoids showed to inhibit lipopolysaccharide-stimulated iNOS expression.79 Therefore, unravelling the potential of promising natural agents with chemopreventive capabilities may help to alleviate NO induced inflammation observed during carcinogenesis.78,80
As mentioned above, the alluring effects of various chemo-preventive agents in reinstating NO levels that control the successive stages of tumor progression has been recognized.81 A colossal amount of data indicated that chemopreventive agents with antioxidant and anti-carcinogenic potential, reduced NO-induced modulation of genes which influence cancer proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis.82 Hence, based on the molecular markers targeted at various stages of tumor progression, chemopreventive agents have been classified as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).83
Some NSAIDs act as COX-2 inhibitors that play an anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenic role.83 COX-2 triggers the inflammatory process during NO-mediated tumor proliferation. COX-2 suppression has shown to simultaneously inhibit NO levels. Celecoxib, a COX-2 inhibitor, has been proven to be an effective chemopreventive agent against breast and colon cancer to alleviate angiogenesis and metastasis in combination treatment with anti-angiogenic agents. Curcumin, inhibits extracellular-signal regulated kinase (ERK) and consequently hinders translation of NF-κB and COX-2,82 both of which are involved in the regulation of NO.82 Curcumin attenuates NO and COX-2 through a post transcriptional event, thereby aiding in colon cancer prevention through its anti-inflammatory efficacy.83 Another COX-2 inhibitor, resveratrol, suppressed inducible NO levels in SW480 human colon cancer cells by phosphorylating of inhibitor of κB (IκB).84 Soyasaponin, an another anti-inflammatory agent, was also shown to reduce NO production, by reducing COX-2 and inducible NOS expression in prostate colon and breast cancers.85 Aspirin enhances the endogenous production of maspin, which inhibits invasion and metastasis in breast tumors, via the restoration of NO production.86 Aliphatic isothiocyanates, such as sulphorafane (SFN) abundant in cruciferous vegetables, were indicated in a study to down regulate the expression of iNOS and COX-2 through the thiol-dependent inhibition of DNA binding to NF-κB.87 Similar results were obtained and further suggested that a combination of SFN and curcumin may be more effective in synergistically downregulating the activity of inflammatory markers such as TNF, IL-1 and NO.88 Anti-estrogenic agents, such as genestein, also inactivated NF-κB via downregulation of Akt in numerous cell lines.89 Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) protects cellular damage, which is partly imparted through NO elevation, by blocking inflammatory kinases such as AKT and PI3K.8
The efficacy of numerous chemopreventive agents in inhibiting angiogenesis have been investigated since long before.84 To elucidate their anti-angiogenic mechanism, researchers sought to correlate NO with other pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGF in various experiments.88 VEGF exacerbates NO production during angiogenesis.86 Natural dietary VEGF inhibitors have therefore shown to control tumor angiogenesis.87 VEGF pathway-based therapy has been successful in curbing down angiogenesis by decreasing NO production.88 Flavolignans such as silibinin exerted their anti-angiogenic role by downregulating iNOS activity in lung cancer.80 Dietary alkaloids, such as harmine, inhibited the anomalous elevation of pro-angiogenic factors, especially NO and VEGF.89 iNOS aggravates angiogenesis by the activation of PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway in melanoma and several other cancers. This activation was reversed by treatment with magnolol, a hydroxylated biphenyl compound extracted from
Certain dietary agents render themselves as anti-metastatic agents by targeting NO levels. NO has been implicated in the activation of c-Src (a non-receptor tyrosine kinase) which is involved in tumor progression and metastasis.90 Studies in breast cancer elucidated its mechanism by showing that c-Src activation by β-estradiol, depended on the production of NO.91 Furthermore, the NO-mediated c-Src activation suppressed E-Cadherin expression.92 Consequently, loss of E-cadherin expression is a hallmark feature in cancer that instigates the disruption of cell-cell adhesion and hence tumor cell invasion.90 Modulation of E-cadherin in conjunction with overexpression of TGF-β1 has especially shown to play a critical role in carcinogenesis of the urinary bladder.90 Among the many available chemopreventive agents (Table 1), EGCG’s inhibitory role in the invasion of A375 cells was attributed, to the upregulation of E-cadherin in a concentration and time dependant manner.8 Du et al.62 suggested the anti-metastatic effect of EGCG by the enhanced expression of p27 and E-cadherin in human glioma cells. Another study demonstrated that the suppression of cell migration by EGCG in bladder cancer was through the inactivation of N-cadherin, which was in turn due to inactivation of Akt signalling.21 Zhang et al. elucidated the eminent role of EGCG in inhibiting angiogenesis, via the downregulation of vascular endothelial-cadherin and Akt.25 Other agents such as dithiolethione modified valproate, sulindac and diclofenac, were collectively shown to enhance E-cadherin expression in non-small cell lung cancer.86
Like E-cadherin, MMP is also involved in the loss of cellular adhesion, thereby enabling the cells to metastasize. Previous studies have shown a reciprocal relationship between NOS and MMP levels, which collectively exacerbate tumor invasion and metastasis. Knockdown experiments by Zhang et al.25 confirmed that decreased production of L-arginine-induced NO, subsequently decreased the expression of MMP-1 levels in melanoma cells. The activation of transcription factors, namely ERK-1/2 and AP-1, elucidated the notorious role of NO towards triggering cancer metastasis via MMP-9.89 Furthermore, Patruno et al.92 provided further insight into the mechanism of MMP upregulation. Based on their results on human acute monocytic leukemia cells, they indicated an aberration in iNOS through environmental influence. This affected the expression of tissue inhibitors of MMPs involved in the regulation of MMPs. Ipobscurine, an indole alkaloid, suppressed the activation of genes involved in metastasis and tumor proliferation, namely MMPs, caspase-3, p53, Bax, and transcription factors such as NF-κB.91–94
Several chemopreventive agents, including terpenes, sulphides, phenols, organic acids, and other macromolecules, modulate carcinogen detoxification enzymes. For example, the major mechanism by which SFN and other organosulfur compounds exert their anti-carcinogenic potential is by upregulating the transcription of glutathione S-transferase P (GSTP), a phase II detoxification enzyme, via the activation of c-jun and Nrf2 binding to enhancer element enhancer I of GSTP.85 Several studies suggest the upregulation of GSTP1 in various tumors.86 Downregulation of GSTP1 resulted in increased susceptibility to gastric, colorectal, and lung cancer progression.92 Apart from its role in detoxification, GST enzymes are also involved in the regulation of NO pathways.8 Kenneth and his co-workers used a GST-null mice to demonstrate the significant elevation in the level of inflammatory genes, including iNOS in colon cancer.87 GST-π is over-expressed in oral cancer in conjunction with NO obtained from cigarette smoke.88 Various chemopreventive agents, such as green tea extracts, broccoli sprout extracts, EGCG, phenethyl isothiocyanate, and benzyl isothiocyanate, were also able to augment phase II enzyme activity (GSTP1), in lung cancer.7 SFN activated Nrf, involved in the induction of phase 2 detoxification enzymes which predominantly downregulates during oncogenesis.88
The chemopreventive agents induce NO production and thus facilitate apoptosis. Thus, chemoprevention shows a potential to be used for cancer therapeutics in the near future and one of its main target would be NO.
The authors acknowledge Zayed University Research Incentive Fund (RIF) (activity code: R14020) for the financial support. The authors are also grateful to Ms. Madhumitha Kedhari Sundaram and Payal Goala for their valuable suggestions in preparing this review article.
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Table 1.. Chemo-preventive agents and their molecular targets.
|Chemo-preventive agents||Source||Molecular target||Reference No.|
|Curcumin||Turmeric||Inhibition of IκBα, ERK1/2 downregulation of NF-κB||93, 94|
|Gingerol||Ginger||Inhibition of cell development factor||93, 94|
|Epigallocatechin gallate||Green tea||Inhibition of AP1, VEGF, STAT3, and NF-κB||93, 94|
|Capsaicin||Pepper||Induction of apoptosis and inhibition NF-κB expression||93, 94|
|Genistein||Soybeans||Suppression of NF-κB and AKT||93, 94|
|Resveratrol||Red grapes||Inhibition of PKC and AP1 transformation||93, 94|
|Quercitin||Caper||Caspase-dependent apoptosis||93, 94|
|Sulforaphane||Broccoli||Inactivation of NF-κB binding with DNA.||93, 94|
|Lycopene||Tomato||Upregulation of antioxidant response element||93, 94|
|Eugenol||Cloves||Downregulation of Bcl-2, COX-2, and IL-1β.||93, 94|
ERK, extracellular-signal regulated kinase; PKC, protein tyrosine kinase; AP1, activator protein-1; IL-1β, interleukin 1β..
Rohini Gomathinayagam, Ji Hee Ha, Muralidharan Jayaraman, Yong Sang Song, Ciro Isidoro, Danny N. DhanasekaranJ Cancer Prev 2020; 25(3): 136-151 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2020.25.3.136
Earl Han, Eunyoung Ha, Sung-Hoon Kim, Joo-Ho Chung, Hyung Hwan Baik and Ju Yeon BanCancer prevention research 2010; 15(2): 138-142
Mark Steven Miller, Peter J. Allen, Powel H. Brown, Andrew T. Chan, Margie L. Clapper, Roderick H. Dashwood, Shadmehr Demehri, Mary L. Disis, Raymond N. DuBois, Robert J. Glynn, Thomas W. Kensler, Seema A. Khan, Bryon D. Johnson, Karen T. Liby, Steven M. Lipkin, Susan R. Mallery, Emmanuelle J. Meuillet, Richard B.S. Roden, Robert E. Schoen, Zelton D. Sharp, Haval Shirwan, Jill M. Siegfried, Chinthalapally V. Rao, Ming You, Eduardo Vilar, Eva Szabo, Altaf MohammedJ Cancer Prev 2021; 26(1): 71-82 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2021.26.1.71