Journal of Cancer Prevention 2015; 20(1): 70-77
Published online March 30, 2015
https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2015.20.1.70
© Korean Society of Cancer Prevention
Tae Hun Kim1, Jee Hye Han2, Eun Shin3, Jae Hong Noh4, Hee Seung Kim5, and Yong Sang Song5,6,7
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, 2Mirae & Heemang OBGYN Clinic, Seoul, 3Departments of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 4Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, 5Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, 6Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, 7Major in Biomodulation, World Class University, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to :
Yong Sang Song, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea Tel: +82-2-2072-2822, Fax: +82-2-762-3599, E-mail: yssong@snu.ac.kr, ORCID: Yong Sang Song,
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grading is subjective and affected by substantial rates of discordance among pathologists. Although the use of p16INK4a (p16) staining has been proven to improve diagnostic accuracy for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), the clinical evidence for use of Ki-67 and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is insufficient to make an independent recommendation for use, alone or in combination. The primary objective was to evaluate clinical utility of Ki-67 and PCNA in combination with p16 in diagnosing HSIL. Also, we assessed the correlation between expressions of three biomarkers and resection margin status of conization specimen. The expressions of p16, Ki-67, and PCNA were evaluated by immunohistochemical methods in 149 cervical tissues encompassing 17 negative lesion, 31 CIN 1, 25 CIN 2, 41 CIN 3, and 35 invasive squamous cell carcinoma. The immunohistochemical staining results were classified into four grades: 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+. The expression of three biomarkers was positively associated with CIN grade. Ki-67 immunostaining did not increase the accuracy of HSIL diagnosis when combined with p16 immunostaining compared with p16 immunostaining alone. In contrast, combining the staining results for p16 and PCNA (p16 = 3+ and PCNA ≥2+) increased its specificity (66.7% vs. 75.0%, We found that the combined use of p16 and PCNA immunostaining enhanced diagnostic accuracy for HSIL. Positive Ki-67 immunostaining was associated with incomplete excision.Background:
Methods:
Results:
Conclusions:
Keywords: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, p16INK4a, Ki-67, Proliferating cell nuclear antigen, Conization
Kyeong A So, Jin Hwa Hong, and Jae Kwan Lee
Journal of Cancer Prevention 2016; 21(2): 104-109 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2016.21.2.104Yoon Sung Choi, and Kyung Eun Lee
Journal of Cancer Prevention 2015; 20(4): 268-274 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2015.20.4.268