J Cancer Prev 2019; 24(3): 183-191
Published online September 30, 2019
https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2019.24.3.183
© Korean Society of Cancer Prevention
1Department of Pharmacology, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University, Daejeon, 2Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Knowledge-Based Services Engineering, Sungshin Women’s University, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence to :
Hye-Kyung Na
E-mail: nhkdec28@gmail.com, ORCID: Hye-Kyung Na, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0460-2810
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Erratum: J Cancer Prev 2019;24:245-
https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2019.24.4.245
Abnormal upregulation of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is considered to be a key oncogenic event in the development and progression of inflammation-associated human colon cancer. It has been reported that 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), an enzyme catabolizing PGE2, is ubiquitously downregulated in human colon cancer. 15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2), a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ ligand, has been shown to have anticarcinogenic activities. In this study, we investigate the effect of 15d-PGJ2 on expression of 15-PGDH in human colon cancer HCT116 cells.
HCT116 cells were treated with 15d-PGJ2. The expression of 15-PGDH in the treated cells was measured by Western blot analysis and RT-PCR. In addition, the cells were subjected to a 15-PGDH activity assay. To determine which transcription factor(s) and signaling pathway(s) are involved in 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression, we performed a cDNA microarray analysis of 15d-PGJ2-treated cells. The DNA binding activity of AP-1 was measured by an electrophoretic mobility shift assay. To determine whether the AP-1 plays an important role in the 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression, the cells were transfected with siRNA of c-Jun, a major subunit of AP-1. To elucidate the upstream signaling pathways involved in AP-1 activation by 15d-PGJ2, we examined its effect on phosphorylation of Akt by Western blot analysis in the presence or absence of kinase inhibitor.
15d-PGJ2 (10 μM) significantly upregulated 15-PGDH expression at the mRNA and protein levels in HCT-116 cells. 15-PGDH activity was also elevated by 15d-PGJ2. We observed that genes encoding C/EBP delta, FOS-like antigen 1, c-Jun, and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) were most highly induced in the HCT116 cells following 15d-PGJ2 treatment. 15d-PGJ2 increased the DNA binding activity of AP-1. Moreover, transfection with specific siRNA against c-Jun significantly reduced 15-PGDH expression induced by 15d-PGJ2. 15d-PGJ2 activates Akt and a pharmacological inhibitor of Akt, LY294002, abrogated 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression. We also observed that an inhibitor of HO-1, zinc protoporphyrin IX, also abrogated upregulation of 15-PGDH and down-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression induced by 15d-PGJ2.
These finding suggest that 15d-PGJ2 upregulates the expression of 15-PGDH through AP-1 activation in colon cancer HCT116 cells.
Keywords: 15-deoxy-&Delta,12,14-prostaglandin J2, 15-PGDH, AP-1, HO-1, Colon cancer
Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), one of the major metabolites of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), plays a role in the proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and apoptosis resistance of malignant and cancerous cells [1]. It is widely accepted that aberrant overexpression of COX-2 and the abundance of its product PGE2 contribute to the development of colorectal cancer [2]. Therefore, deregulation of the COX-2/PGE2 pathway appears to impact colorectal tumorigenesis via a number of distinct mechanisms, including the promotion of tumor maintenance, progression, metastatic spread, and perhaps even tumor initiation [2]. Notably, PGE2 levels are elevated in colon cancer due to aberrant expression of COX-2 [1]. The levels of PGE2 are regulated not only by its synthesis via the COX-2-catalized arachidonic acid cascade but also by its metabolism [3]. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) is a representative enzyme that oxidizes PGE2 to 15-keto PGE2 [3].
Recent studies showed that 15-PGDH has tumor suppressor function in colon cancer [4]. 15-PGDH was shown to be upregulated in normal colon epithelium but downregulated in colon cancer and was involved in the cancer progression of initiated colon epithelial cells [5]. In this study, 15-PGDH wild type mice are highly resistance to azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis, whereas loss of 15-PGDH conferred increased susceptibility to colon tumor induction [5]. Moreover, 15-PGDH also reduced the metastatic potential of cancer by inactivating matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) [6]. Thus, upregulation of 15-PGDH levels in cancer cells resulted in decreased clonal growth, leading to reduced tumorigenesis [5]. In addition, 15-PGDH also functions as inhibitor of COX-2 signaling [3]. Thus, 15-PGDH functions, along with COX-2, to regulate metabolism of prostaglandins, and their reciprocal regulation appears to determine cell fate [3].
15-Deoxy-Δ12,14-prostaglandin J2 (15d-PGJ2), one of the terminal products of COX-2-mediated catabolism, has been shown to inhibit growth of several different types of cancer cells and to induce their apoptosis [7]. We have previously shown that 15d-PGJ2 increases 15-PGDH expression through reactive oxygen species (ROS)-mediated activation of ERK1/2 and Elk-1 in human breast cancer cells [8] and through suppression of DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1)-mediated hypermethylation of the 15-PGDH promoter via its direct interaction with DNMT1 in MDA-MB-231 cells [9]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of 15-PGDH remain unclarified. Here, we examined the effects of 15d-PGJ2 on 15-PGDH expression in human colon cancer cells (HCT116).
All chemical reagents were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). 15d-PGJ2 was purchased from Cayman Chemical Co. (Ann Arbor, MI). MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetra-zolium bromide] was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Fetal Bovine Serum, penicillin/streptomycin, McCoy’s 5A medium were obtained from Gibco BRL (Grand Island, NY). Reagents for Western blotting analysis were obtained from Amersham Biotechnology (Bucks, UK). LY294002 and zinc protoporphyrin IX (ZnPP) were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diago, CA). Primers for RT-PCR were synthesized by Bioneer (Daejeon, Korea). Reverse transcriptase was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). Antibodies for 15-PGDH, p-Akt, and Akt were obtained from Cell signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA), COX-2 was from Lab Vision Co. (Fremont, CA, USA), β-Actin was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Oligonucleotide probes containing AP-1 consensus sequences located in the human 15-PGDH promoter region was obtained from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). The enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) and [γ-32P]ATP were supplied from Amersham Pharmacia Biotech (Buckinghamxhire, UK).
HCT116 cells were grown in McCoy’s 5A medium (Gibco, CA) supplemented with 100 ng/mL penicillin and 10% fetal bovine serum in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. To evaluate cytotoxicity, cells were treated with MTT solution (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Germany), as described in the supplier’s protocol.
Protein in lysates were generated with cell lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, MA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to Hybond-ECL (Amersham Biosciences, UK) membranes. Blots were incubated with primary antibodies and peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies. Blots were visualized using ECL.
Total RNA from HCT116 cells was isolated using Trizol® (GibcoBRL, NY). The following primers were used for amplification: 15-PGDH, 5′-GTAAAGCTGCCCTGGATGAG-3′ and 5′-AACAAAGCCTGGACAAATGG-3′; HO-1, 5′-GAGCGGCTTCAAGCTGGTGA-3′ and 5′-TAGGGGATGACCTCCTGCCA-3′; GAPDH, 5′-CCATGGAGAAGGCTGGGG-3′ and 5′-CAAAGTTGTCATGGATGACC-3′. PCR were performed over 32 cycle (95°C for 30 s, 62°C for 30 s, and 70°C for 45 s for 15-PGDH and GAPDH; 94°C for 30 s, 64°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 60 s for HO-1), using 2X PCR Mastermix (Bioneer, Korea). Each PCR products was resolved on 1% agarose gels, and visualized by Redsafe staining (iNtRON Biotechnology, Korea).
15-PGDH activity was assessed by the tritium release assay with cellular lysates as described previously [8]. Briefly, the transfer of tritium from 15(S)-[15-3H]PGE2 to glutamate by 15-PGDH was assayed.
Nuclear extracts were obtained using NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Extraction Reagents (Pierce, IL). The oligonucleotide containing to the AP-1 sequence was end-labeled with [γ-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase and 10 μg of nuclear extracts were incubated with [γ-32P]ATP labeled DNA probe in gel shift binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 1 μg/μL poly (dI-dC), 4% glycerol and 100 mM NaCl). The DNA-protein complexes were resolved by a 6% non-denaturating polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analyzed by autoradiography.
siRNA against c-Jun was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). HCT116 cells were transiently transfected with siRNA against c-Jun using the RNAiMax transfection reagent (Invitrogen, CA) and were incubated overnight, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After the 24 h transfection, the cells were treated with 15d-PGJ2.
All data were expressed as the means ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by Student’s
Detailed Materials and Methods for RNA preparation, Labeling, and purification, Hybridization and data export, and Raw data preparation can find in
To determine the optimal dose of 15d-PGJ2, HCT116 cells were treated with various concentrations of 15d-PGJ2 and cell viability was determined by the MTT assay (Fig. 1). Then, a non-cytotoxic concentration of 15d-PGJ2 (10 μM) was used for all subsequent experiments. Treatment of HCT116 cells with 15d-PGJ2 at 0, 5, 10, and 15 μM for 24 h induced 15-PGDH expression (Fig. 2A). A kinetic study showed that 15-PGDH protein was induced by 15d-PGJ2 in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 2B). Upregulation of 15-PGDH was observed beginning at 12 h, and it continued to increase until 24 h in the presence of 15d-PGJ2 (Fig. 2B). RT-PCR analysis showed that 15-PGDH mRNA accumulation was transient and was only observed between 1 and 6 h (Fig. 2C). 15-PGDH activity, as determined by the production of α-keto-glutamate, was markedly increased in cells treated with 15d-PGJ2 for 24 h (Fig. 2D). Thus, 15d-PGJ2 upregulates expression of 15-PGDH and increases its cataltytic activity as well.
15-PGDH synthesis is controlled mainly at transcription level. Within the 15-PGDH promoter region, there are binding cites for several transcription factors, such as activating protein-1 (AP-1), Ets, and cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) [10,11]. 15d-PGJ2 is known to enhance AP-1 activation [12]. Moreover, microarray analysis data revealed that C-Jun, a subunit of AP-1, was most highly induced in the HCT116 cells following 15d-PGJ2 treatment (Supplementary Table 1). Therefore, we examined the DNA binding activity of AP-1 in cells treated with 15d-PGJ2. When HCT116 cells were treated with 15d-PGJ2, increased DNA binding of AP-1 was only transiently observed, between 1 and 6 h (Fig. 3A). The specificity of the 15d-PGJ2-induced AP-1 DNA binding was verified by a competition experiment in which the addition of an 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled human AP-1 oligonucleotides completely blocked formation of the radiolabeled DNA-AP-1 protein complex (Fig. 3A, cold probe). AP-1 proteins are homo- or heterodimers composed of basic region-leucine zipper proteins, including Jun and Fos [13]. Therefore, to further confirm that 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression was specifically due to AP-1-mediated transcriptional regulation, we conducted additional experiments using HCT116 cells transfected with c-Jun siRNA. The results showed that 15d-PGJ2-induced upregulation of 15-PGDH in HCT116 cells was abolished by the silencing of c-Jun gene expression with specific siRNA (Fig. 3B). These results indicate that 15d-PGJ2-induced upregulation of 15-PGDH is mediated, at least in part, by activation of AP-1 signaling.
To elucidate the upstream signaling events that lead to the activation of AP-1 and the induction of 15-PGDH expression, we examined the 15d-PGJ2-induced phosphorylation levels of representative signal-transducing kinases. We noted that Akt phosphorylation was transiently increased between 1 and 6 h after treatment with 15d-PGJ2 (Fig. 4A). To verify the involvement of the Akt pathway in AP-1-mediated induction of 15-PGDH expression, cells were pre-incubated with the Akt inhibitor (LY294002) and then treated with 15d-PGJ2 for 24 h. Pharmacologic inhibition of Akt with LY294002 abrogated 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression (Fig. 4B). These findings indicate that the Akt pathway is involved in 15d-PGJ2-induced upregulation of 15-PGDH in HCT116 cells.
To elucidate the target genes regulated by 15d-PGJ2 in HCT116 cells, we performed a microarray analysis (Supplementary Table 1). Notably, heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), a representative antioxidant enzyme regulated by Nrf2, was most highly elevated by 15d-PGJ2. Treatment with 15d-PGJ2 for 24 h resulted in the induction of HO-1 expression in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 5A). The RT-PCR analysis showed that accumulation of HO-1 mRNA occurred between 1 and 24 h (Fig. 5B). To further verify the involvement of HO-1 expression in the induction of 15-PGDH expression, cells were pre-incubated with the HO-1 inhibitor ZnPP for 12 h and then treated with 15d-PGJ2 for additional 24 h. Pharmacologic inhibition of HO-1 with ZnPP abrogated 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression (Fig. 5C) and basal level of 15-PGDH expression in HCT116 cells (Fig. 5D). However, ZnPP induced expression of COX-2 in a concentration-dependent manner while 15-PGDH expression was down-regulated (Fig. 5C and 5D). These findings indicates that 15d-PGJ2-induced upregulation of 15-PGDH expression is mediated, at least in part, by HO-1 induction.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer death and the third most common cancer worldwide [14]. Colitis-associated cancer develops from chronically inflamed mucosa and progresses through dysplasia to adenocarcinoma in the so-called inflammation-dysplasia-carcinoma sequence [15]. Therefore, persons with chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) show elevated risk of CRC [16]. In addition to IBD,
Although chronic inflammation can initiate and promote gastrointestinal cancer, the molecular mechanisms are still not well understood [18]. Several studies have suggested that colon cancer has increased levels of prostaglandin, especially, PGE2. The increase in PGE2 levels induced by COX-2 upregulation can promote apoptosis resistance in transformed cells and accelerate metastasis in colon cancer [19]. A positive feedback has been proposed between PGE2 and COX-2 in colon cancer, in which PGE2 induces the expression of COX-2, and upregulation of COX-2 increases the generation of PGE2 [1]. Therefore, inactivation of PGE2 could inhibit the development and progression of colon cancer.
Excess PGE2 is inactivated by overexpression of 15-PGDH, a key enzyme that catalyzes the conversion of oncogenic PGE2 to a biologically inactive keto metabolite [19]. Chemopreventive/chemoprotective agents, such as NSAIDs, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, calcitriol, PPARγ ligands, and glucocorticoids have been known to exert their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic activities by inducting expression of 15-PGDH while suppressing COX-2 expression [20]. Tai et al. reported that NSAIDs induced 15-PGDH expression by up-regulation of its transcription and suppression of its degradation [21]. 15d-PGJ2 is a ligand of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). It is produced in inflamed cells and tissues as a consequence of COX-2 upregulation [22]. 15d-PGJ2 has been shown to have significant anti-cancer effects such as anti-inflammatory, pro-apoptotic, anti-metastatic, and anti-angiogenic activities [7]. Here, we report that 15d-PGJ2 upregulates the expression of 15-PGDH in the HCT116 human colon cancer cell line. In our previous study, down-regulation of 15-PGDH promoted the migration of breast cancer cells [8]. In a recent study, Mehdawi et al. reported that recombinant WNT5A (rWNT5A) and a WNT5A-mimicking peptide (Foxy-5) induced 15-PGDH expression through down-regulated β-catenin and induced AP-1 in colon and breast cancer cells [23]. They also demonstrated that LTC4, a cysteinyl leukotriene 2 ligand, upregulated 15-PGDH expression by inducing 15-PGDH promoter activity through JNK/AP-1 signaling [24]. Similarly, our study proved that 15d-PGJ2 induced 15-PGDH expression by stimulating binding of AP-1 to the
Besides AP-1, the 15-PGDH promoter regions also have several E-boxes, which are bound by the transcriptional repressors Snail, Slug, and ZEB1 [25]. These transcriptional repressors bind to the conserved E-box elements of 15-PGDH promotor and reduce its transcription. Elevated Snail expression is correlated with the down-regulation of 15-PGDH expression in colon cancer [25]. Mann et al. reported that epidermal growth factor inhibits 15-PGDH activity in colon cancer cells by inducing of Snail [25]. Yang et al. have shown that inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling elevates 15-PGDH in non-small-cell lung cancer [26]. The EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor increased 15-PGDH expression by reducing Slug levels.
15d-PGJ2 has therapeutic potential for the prevention of inflammatory diseases [22]. 15d-PGJ2 exerts potent anti- inflammatory effects by activating of Nrf2, leading to the resolution of inflammatory responses [22,27]. Many studies have suggested that 15d-PGJ2 induces HO-1 expression in various cells by activating Nrf2. Because 15d-PGJ2 has an α,β-unsaturated ketone moiety, it functions as an electrophile. Therefore, 15d-PGJ2 can easily interact with cysteine residues of proteins via the Michael addition reaction [28]. In this study, cDNA microarray analysis showed that HO-1 was the most highly elevated gene induced by 15d-PGJ2 treatment. Interestingly, a HO-1 inhibitor significantly abrogated 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression and induced COX-2 expression, and this is the first study to report the effect of HO-1 on the expression of 15-PGDH. 15d-PGJ2 may also upregulate 15-PGDH by inducing protein translation and reducing protein degradation by HO-1. However, the precise mechanism underlying the association between 15-PGDH and HO-1 in 15d-PGJ2-induced signaling cascades requires further research.
Expression of 15-PGDH and COX-2 has been known to be reciprocally regulated [29]. In this study, treatment with an HO-1 inhibitor significantly decreased 15-PGDH expression but increased COX-2 expression. Many studies have suggested that several chemopreventive agents show anti-inflammatory activity by up-regulation of HO-1 [30,31]. Kim et al. reported that 15d-PGJ2 facilitated the resolution of inflammation by promoting Nrf2-induced expression of CD36 and HO-1 in macrophages [27]. Therefore, pretreatment with an HO-1 inhibitor reduced their anti-inflammatory activity. Taken together, 15d-PGJ2, acting as a potent HO-1 inducer, may have health-promoting effects by preventing inflammation through induction of HO-1.
In conclusion, our present study showed that 15d-PGJ2 significantly induced 15-PGDH expression in HCT116 human colon cancer cells via AP-1 activation, Akt phosphorylation, and HO-1 induction. These findings provide a novel mechanism by which 15d-PGJ2 exhibits a remarkable capability of inducing 15-PGDH expression.
This study was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (No. 2012015106).
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Effect of 15d-PGJ2 on viability of human colon cancer cell line. HCT116 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of 15d-PGJ2 for 24 h, and their viability was determined by the MTT assay. The data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences between the compared groups are indicated (*
15d-PGJ2-induced expression and catalytic activity of 15-PGDH in HCT116 cells. HCT116 cells were treated with 5, 10 or 15 μM of 15d-PGJ2 for 24 h (A) and with 10 μM 15d-PGJ2 for 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 h (B). Total protein isolated from cell lysates was subjected to immunoblot analysis for the measurement of 15-PGDH. (C) The mRNA level of 15-PGDH was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The mRNA level of GAPDH was used as an internal control. (D) HCT116 cells were treated with 15d-PGJ2 (0, 5, 10 or 15 μM) for 24 h. By measuring the transfer of tritium from titiated PGE2 to glutamate, the activity of 15-PGDH was determined. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3). Significant differences between the compared groups are indicated (*
Involvement of AP-1 in the induction of 15-PGDH by 15d-PGJ2 in HCT116 cells. (A) HCT116 cells were treated with 15d-PGJ2 (10 μM) for indicated time periods. The DNA-binding activity of AP-1 in HCT116 cells treated with 15d-PGJ2 was measured by EMSA as described in Materials and Methods. (B) HCT116 cells were transfected with nonspecific or c-Jun siRNA using lifopectamineTM RNAiMAX transfection reagent. After 24 h transfection, cells were treated with 10 μM 15d-PGJ2 for an additional 24 h. Protein extracts from cell lysates were analyzed by Western blot with 15-PGDH and Actin antibodies.
15d-PGJ2-induced expression of 15-PGDH through activation of Akt signaling. (A) The time-related activation of Akt was assessed by measuring the phosphorylated form of Akt. HCT116 cells were treated with 10 μM 15d-PGJ2 for the indicated time periods followed by immunoblot analysis with specific antibodies. (B) The effect of the Akt inhibitor on the induction of 15-PGDH was assessed by Western blot analysis in HCT116 cells. HCT116 cells were exposed to 10 μM 15d-PGJ2 for 24 h in the presence of 0, 5 or 20 μM LY294002. Whole-cell lysates were subjected to Western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies.
Effect of HO-1 on 15d-PGJ2-induced 15-PGDH expression. (A) HCT116 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of 15d-PGJ2 for 24 h. Total protein isolated from cell lysates was subjected to immunoblot analysis for the measurement of HO-1. (B) The mRNA level of HO-1 was determined by quantitative RT-PCR. The mRNA level of GAPDH was used as an internal control. (C) The effect of the HO-1 inhibitor ZnPP on the induction of 15-PGDH was assessed by Western blot analysis. HCT116 cells were pretreated with ZnPP (0, 5 10 μM) for 12 h. After changing the medium with a fresh one, cells were exposed to 15d-PGJ2 (10 μM) for additional 24 h. (D) HCT116 cells were treated with ZnPP (0, 1, 5 or 10 μM) for 24 h. Expression levels of 15-PGDH and COX-2 protein were determined by Western blot analysis. The data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n =3). Significant differences between the compared groups are indicated (*
Chin-Hee Song, Nayoung Kim, Ryoung Hee Nam, Soo In Choi, Changhee Kang, Jae Young Jang, Heewon Nho, Eun Shin, Ha-Na Lee
J Cancer Prev 2021; 26(1): 41-53 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2021.26.1.41Jeong-Sang Lee, Hyun Soo Kim, Ki Baik Hahm, Young-Joon Surh
Journal of Cancer Prevention 2020; 25(1): 27-37 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2020.25.1.27Hyuk Yoon, Nayoung Kim, Ji Hyun Park, Yong Sung Kim, Jongchan Lee, Hyoung Woo Kim, Yoon Jin Choi, Cheol Min Shin, Young Soo Park, Dong Ho Lee, and Hyun Chae Jung
Journal of Cancer Prevention 2017; 22(2): 108-114 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2017.22.2.108