Journal of Cancer Prevention 2017; 22(1): 16-21
Published online March 30, 2017
https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2017.22.1.16
© Korean Society of Cancer Prevention
Won Sup Lee1,4,*, Ji Hyun Jung1,4, Radha Panchanathan1,4, Jeong Won Yun1,4, Dong Hoon Kim2,4, Hye Jung Kim3,4, Gon Sup Kim5,6, Chung Ho Ryu7, Sung Chul Shin6,8, Soon Chan Hong4,9, Yung Hyun Choi10,11, and Jin-Myung Jung4,12,*
1Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea, 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea, 3Department of Pharmacology, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea, 4Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, 5School of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, 6Research Institute of Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, 7Division of Applied Life Science (BK 21 Program), Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, 8Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Sciences, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea, 9Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea, 10Department of Biochemistry, Dongeui University College of Oriental Medicine, Busan, Korea, 11Anti-Aging Research Center & Blue-Bio Industry RIC, Dongeui University, Busan, Korea, 12Department of Neurosurgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
Correspondence to :
Won Sup Lee, Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences and Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, 15 Jinju-daero 816beon-gil, Jinju 52727, Korea, Tel: +82-55-750-8733, Fax: +82-55-758-9122, E-mail: lwshmo@gshp.gsnu.ac.kr
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Bile acids have anti-cancer properties in a certain types of cancers. We determined anticancer activity and its underlying molecular mechanism of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in human DU145 prostate cancer cells. Cell viability was measured with an MTT assay. UDCA-induced apoptosis was determined with flow cytometric analysis. The expression levels of apoptosis-related signaling proteins were examined with Western blotting. UDCA treatment significantly inhibited cell growth of DU145 in a dose-dependent manner. It induced cellular shrinkage and cytoplasmic blebs and accumulated the cells with sub-G1 DNA contents. Moreover, UDCA activated caspase 8, suggesting that UDCA-induced apoptosis is associated with extrinsic pathway. Consistent to this finding, UDCA increased the expressions of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor, death receptor 4 (DR4) and death receptor 5 (DR5), and TRAIL augmented the UDCA-induced cell death in DU145 cells. In addition, UDCA also increased the expressions of Bax and cytochrome UDCA induces apoptosis via extrinsic pathway as well as intrinsic pathway in DU145 prostate cancer cells. UDCA may be a promising anti-cancer agent against prostate cancer.Background
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords: Ursodeoxycholic acid, DU145, Apoptosis, Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand, Prostate cancer
Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent cancers in men worldwide. High fat and red meat diet is one of the contributing factors to the development of prostate cancer. Notably, it is the second leading cause of cancer death for men in most developed countries.1 Also, it is the second most common cancer in men, about an estimated 192,000 and 346,000 new cases diagnosed each year in the United States and Europe, respectively. In addition, most of cases are elderly patients. These elderly patients cannot tolerate conventional chemotherapy. The prostate cancer refractory to hormonal therapy is hard to treat. Therefore, new therapeutic strategy is required for the treatment of this disease.
Bile acids is the outcome of cholesterol catabolism, and their main function is to solubilize the dietary fats and fat-soluble vitamins from the intestinal lumen.2,3 Reports have shown that bile acids possess anti-neoplastic and anti-carcinogenic properties in many cancer cells, such as tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, and neuroblastoma cells.4 Among them, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is a hydrophobic bile acid that accounts for 4% of total bile acids,5 and has been used for treatment of the liver and gall bladder disease without a significant toxicity. The tumor suppressive activity of UDCA is believed to be linked with the induction of apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, and the inhibition of oncogenic factors, such as Ras and COX-2, in human cancer cell lines.6 These mechanisms are not yet fully understood. In addition, evidence suggests that anti-cancer effect of UDCA may act differentially depending on cell types, physiologic conditions, and/or stimulus.5,7 Here, we investigated anti-cancer effect of UDCA and its mechanisms on human prostate cancer cells, DU145. The results show that UDCA increased the expressions of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors, death receptor 4 (DR4) and death receptor 5 (DR5), and TRAIL augmented the UDCA-induced cell death in DU145 cells. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting UDCA-induced death receptor-mediated apoptosis in human prostate cancer cells.
Human DU145 prostate cancer cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD, USA). Culture medium used throughout these experiments was RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% (v/v) FBS (GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY, USA), 1 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. UDCA was obtained from Dawoong Inc. (Seoul, Korea), and kept at 4°C with light shield. Antibodies against procaspase 3, procaspase 8, Bax, Bcl-xL, cytochrome
DU145 cells were seeded onto 24-well plates at a density of 5 × 105 cells/mL, and then treated with the indicated concentrations of UDCA for 24 hours and 48 hours. MTT (0.5 mg/mL) was subsequently added to each well. After 3 hours of additional incubation, 100 μL of a solution containing 10% SDS (pH 4.8) plus 0.01 N HCl was added to dissolve the crystals. The absorbance at 570 nm were determined with an ELISA plate reader.
After treatment of UDCA for 24 hours, the cells were collected, washed with cold PBS, and then centrifuged. The pellet was fixed in 75% (v/v) ethanol at 4°C for 1 hour. The cells were washed once with PBS and re-suspended in cold PI solution (50 μg/mL) containing RNase A (0.1 mg/mL) in PBS (pH 7.4) for 30 minutes in the dark. The stained cells were analyzed by fluorescent activated cell sorting (FACS) for relative DNA content based on red fluorescence on a FACScan flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA).
DU145 cells were treated with indicated concentrations of UDCA for indicated times at 37°C and cells were lysed in ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (1% [w/w] NP40, 1% [w/v] sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% [w/v] SDS, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.01 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, 2 mM EDTA, 50 mM NaF, and protease inhibitors). The cells were disrupted by sonication and extracted at 4°C for 30 minutes. The protein concentrations were quantified using the BioRad protein assay kit (BioRad Lab., Hercules, CA, USA). The proteins in the extracts were resolved by electrophoresis and electro-transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). The membrane was incubated with the primary antibodies and a secondary antibodies conjugated to peroxidase. Blots were developed with an ECL detection system.
Results were expressed as means ± SD. Comparison of the effects of various treatments was performed by the one-way ANOVA with post-test Neuman-Keuls and Student
To investigate anti-cancer activity of UDCA, DU145 cells were treated with various concentrations of UDCA (0 to 200 μg/mL) for 24 hours and 48 hours. Cell growth was assessed by an MTT assay. The MTT assay revealed that the growth of DU145 cells was inhibited by UDCA treatment in a dose-dependent manner, and the 50% inhibition of cell growth (IC50) was approximately 200 μg/mL (Fig. 1A). To determine whether the decreased cell viability was due to apoptotic cell death, we assessed the changes in cellular morphology of UDCA-treated cells under a light microscope. Cellular shrinkage and cytoplasmic blebs were observed at the concentration of 100 μg/mL or higher (Fig. 1B). Next, we analyzed the magnitude of apoptotic cell death and cell cycle distribution in UDCA-treated cells by flow cytometry. As shown in Figure 2, UDCA induced in a significant accumulation of cells with sub-G1 DNA content at the concentration of 200 μg/mL. These results suggest that the cytotoxic effects observed in response to UDCA are associated with the induction of apoptotic cell death in human DU145 prostate cancer cells.
We then assessed the effect of UDCA on caspases and their substrates, PARP by Western blot analysis. UDCA activated caspase-3 and caspase-8 in a dose- and time-dependent manner. With the activation of caspases, the cleavage of PARP was increased (Fig. 3). Further, the expression of pro-apoptotic protein Bax was significantly increased; meanwhile anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-xL was significantly decreased in a dose- and time-dependent manner. These pro-apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins involves in the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, which creates pores in the mitochondrial outer membrane, and releases cytochrome
To further investigate the mechanisms of the UDCA-induced apoptosis, we investigated the expression of TRAIL receptors. Western blot analysis revealed that the expression of DR4 and DR5 was significantly up-regulated by UDCA (Fig. 3). This finding suggests that UDCA-induced apoptosis may be associated the death receptor-mediated apoptosis in DU145 cells.
Next, we determined whether TRAIL can enhance the UDCA-induced anti-cancer effect. MTT assay and morphology test revealed that UDCA could augment the TRAIL-induced cell death (Fig. 4A and 4B). Western blot results confirmed that TRAIL treatment up-regulated DR4 and DR5 expressions (Fig. 4C). These findings suggest that TRAIL may promote UDCA-induced apoptosis in DU145 cells.
This study was designed to determine whether UDCA has anti-cancer properties in human prostate cancer cells, and to further investigate the underlying mechanisms of the anti-cancer effect of UDCA. We demonstrated that UDCA induced apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner in human DU145 cells.
Firstly, UDCA significantly inhibited the growth, and shrinking cells and cytoplasmic blebs were observed in DU145 cells. These results are consistent with previous report that biochemical and morphological changes occur during the apoptosis process.9 To determine how UDCA induces apoptosis, Western blot analysis was performed. We found that UDCA induced pro-apoptotic Bax protein whereas it reduced the expression of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-xL protein. UDCA also increased the expression of cytochrome
The limitation of this study is that the only one cell line was used in this study. Therefore, it may be hard to generalize these results. In addition, it is reported that UDCA effects may differ depending on cell types, physiologic conditions, and/or stimulus.7,14,15 However, we also found that UDCA have anti-cancer effect on PC-3 cells even though the up-regulation of TRAIL receptor DR4 and DR5 was not clearly detected (data not shown).
In summary, UDCA induces apoptosis in human DU145 prostate cancer cells (Fig. 5). The apoptosis is triggered by extrinsic pathway through up-regulation of TRAIL receptor DR4 and DR5, as well as intrinsic pathway through modulation of Bax, Bcl-xL and cytochrome
This work was supported by the grants from the National R & D Program for Cancer Control, Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (0820050).
Kader Turkekul, R. Dilsu Colpan, Talha Baykul, Mehmet D. Ozdemir, and Suat Erdogan
Journal of Cancer Prevention 2018; 23(1): 10-17 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2018.23.1.10Muhammad Haroon, Sun Chul Kang
J Cancer Prev 2024; 29(3): 69-87 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.24.013Jaeho Han, Donghwa Kim, Hyen Joo Park, Hee-Juhn Park, Sang Kook Lee
J Cancer Prev 2023; 28(4): 201-211 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2023.28.4.201