Journal of Cancer Prevention

eISSN 2288-3657
pISSN 2288-3649
Fig. 2.

Download original image

Fig. 2. Effect of piceatannol (PIC) on LNCaP cell cycle distribution. Distribution of cells in (A) sub-G0/G1 phase, (B) G0/G1 phase, (C) S phase, and (D) G2/M phase of LNCaP cells after treatment with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or indicated concentrations of PIC for 8, 16, and 24 hours was quantificated by flow cytometry. The results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). Significantly different (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001) compared with corresponding DMSO-treated control by one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnnett’s test. The experiments were repeated at least twice with consistent results. Representative data from one such experiment is shown.
J Cancer Prev 2020;25:87~99 https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2020.25.2.87
© J Cancer Prev
© Korean Society of Cancer Prevention. / Powered by INFOrang Co., Ltd